Wonder what your retirement is going to be like? Wonder what life is going to be like for your kids or grandkids? Well, that’s natural. Of course, you have to remember the lesson of the old tale of “The Monkey’s Paw,” namely that you should be careful of what you wish for, because you just might wind up actually getting your wish.
A lot of
our questions about what life on Earth is going to be like for the foreseeable
future were answered on the front pages of major newspapers on Saturday, May
11, 2013. The headline on the front page
of the New York Times read “Heat-Trapping Gas Passes Milestone, Raising Fears.” http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/11/science/earth/carbon-dioxide-level-passes-long-feared-milestone.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
The LA Times reported the story on the first page of the “Late Extra” section
under the banner “Crucial CO2 gauge hits key level.” http://www.latimes.com/news/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-carbon-atmosphere-440-ppm-20130510,0,6498056.story
To cut to the chase, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reports
that last Thursday, for the very first (but certainly not the last) time, the
level of carbon dioxide in the Earth’s atmosphere as measured by the
observatory on Mauna Loa has surpassed 400 parts per million in an average
daily reading, meaning that there is now more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere
than there has been at any time in the last three million years. Even if you’re not a Biblical scholar, you
should know that three million years ago human beings weren’t even around yet.
Last
Thursday was the first time that the average level remained above 400 parts per
million for an entire day, but it’s predicted that within a very few years
there will be no measurement of the gas, in any area of the globe, in any
season, that will be below 400 parts per million. The reason that the 400 parts
per million threshold is significant is that’s the level that the scientific “consensus”
has decreed that CO2 levels must stay below to keep the average global temperature
from rising 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit above the average from pre-industrial times.
That
may not sound like much, but apparently the last time the carbon dioxide level
was this high was about three million years ago, in the Pliocene
Epoch. It was a lot hotter then, the ice
caps were a lot smaller, and scientists estimate that the sea level was perhaps
60 to 80 feet higher than it is now. Not
real good news if you live in Malibu, I’d say.
Or New York City, or Miami, or… well, you get the idea.
Now of
course, the ocean isn’t going to rise 60 or 80 feet overnight. When you start talking about “epochs,” the
time scale gets a lot bigger than what our “weatherpeople” are used to coping
with in their forecasts. But that doesn’t
mean that you and yours aren’t going to be seeing some of the effects of the
now seemingly inevitable debacle. Melanie Fitzpatrick, a climate scientist, is
quoted in the LA Times article as saying, “If we don’t reduce carbon soon, we
may no longer talk about searing summer temperatures, 100-year storms and
intense droughts as something unusual, because they may be the norm.”
What’s
causing this upheaval? Well, with
apologies to BP, Exxon-Mobil, Shell, and their ilk, the evidence is pretty
conclusive that the culprit is fossil fuels. By studying the air bubbles found in Antarctic
ice (which is melting pretty fast now) scientists have determined that for at
least the last 800 million years the level of CO2 in the atmosphere cycled
between 180 parts per million in cooler times to 280 parts per million in
warmer times. (CO2 levels and
temperature are “tightly linked,” in other words.) Throughout the roughly 8000 years of human
civilization, the CO2 level fluttered around near the top end of that range—until
the “Industrial Revolution” a couple of hundred years ago which kicked off the
massive use of fossil fuels. Since then,
there has been a 41% increase in CO2 levels, with no end in sight.
Why no
end in sight? Well, there are now over 7
billion people in the world, many of them already happily blasting away into
the atmosphere with their air conditioners and motor vehicles, and the rest
aspiring to join them. The New York
Times article, by Justin Gillis, put it very well: “Virtually every automobile ride, every plane
trip and, in most places, every flip of a light switch adds carbon dioxide to the
air, and relatively little money is being spent to find and deploy alternative
technologies.”
Not to
mention the fact that we’re frenetically slashing and burning and chopping away
at the earth’s forests, getting rid of the trees that, as they taught us even
in California public schools, remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and
replace it with oxygen. Plus chopping
down everything in sight so that we can grow corn and soybeans to feed to factory-farmed
animals whose short, miserable lives are mostly spent farting methane.
Why the
hell not, you may ask. If we know there’s
a problem-- a crisis, even-- why aren’t we doing more to try to avert disaster? Well, why did it
take so many years to start warning people about the dangers of cigarette
smoking? There are a lot of people, with
a lot of money, who benefit from the status quo. And they own politicians. Lots of them.
As Mr. Gillis puts it, “[c]limate change contrarians, who have little
scientific credibility but are politically influential in Washington, point out
that carbon dioxide represents only a tiny fraction of the air…” Well, it’s true that most of the air is
nitrogen (78%) and oxygen (21%). But
that’s about the extent of the truth in this absurd argument. Whether
its cobra venom or arsenic, to use a couple of Mr. Gillis’s examples, or a few
hundred wackadoos in Al Qaeda, a little badness can go a long way toward
ruining your day… or your kids’ and grandkids’ future, for that matter.
It may
already be too late to avert disaster, and in fact probably is. If this were a movie, and some scientist
could somehow get representatives of every country on earth together to act in
concert on an emergency basis to go all out to control population growth,
implement green technologies, and rein in the great consumer lifestyle expectations
of the American and Chinese peoples… well then we’d be living on another
planet, anyway, and we probably wouldn’t have had to worry about CO2 in the
first place.
No comments:
Post a Comment